Determination And interpretation of fault size populations: procedures and problems



J. J.Walsh, J. Watterson & G. Yielding1
1 - Badley Earth Sciences, North Beck House, North Beck Lane, Hundleby, Spilsby, Lincolnshire, PE23 5NB.

Abstract - The power-law, or fractal, distribution of fault sizes enables densities of sub-seismic faults of specified sizes to be predicted by extrapolation of population curves of seismically imaged faults. A variety of normal fault datasets mainly from the North Sea have been used to establish and test procedures for measuring populations of seismically imaged faults. The recommended fault size parameter for measurement is the throw on a fault where it is intersected by a sample line. In most cases multi-line sampling and plotting is necessary to obtain sufficient data points for good characterisation of the fault population. Measurements may be made either directly from workstation interpretations of seismic sections or from horizon maps, and throw can be expressed in units of either depth or TWT. A good characterisation requires a range of throw measurements of at least 1.5 orders of magnitude. A range of clastic and carbonate sequences has been investigated and the lithology is shown to have little effect on the general character of population curves for seismically imaged faults, except in the case of salt. When more than one fault set is present, as determined by orientation, each set should be independently measured. Only tectonic fault systems have been fully investigated and gravitational fault systems are unlikely to have such highly ordered population distributions. Techniques and limitations of sub-area sampling are examined. Integration of seismic and well fault data is possible but requires more detailed fracture logging of cores and well images than is now usual. The principal limitation of fault population measurements concerns the difference in size between the area or volume for which a fault population prediction is required (e.g. for reservoir simulation studies), and that for which it can be measured. Sub-areas that can be characterised by seismic data are often larger than required and the converse is true of well data.


In: North Sea Oil and Gas Reservoirs III, (edited by Aasen, J. O. et al.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, 141-155, 1994.